·7 min read

What Employers See When They Google You Before an Interview

Before your next interview, someone is going to Google you. Probably several someones. The recruiter, the hiring manager, maybe their manager too. They do it casually, in between meetings, usually on their phone. What they find in the first 30 seconds often shapes the entire interview.

This isn't a theory. Surveys out of the US consistently show 70 to 80 percent of hiring managers admit to Googling candidates. Australian surveys land in the same range. Nobody calls it a background check because it isn't official. But it happens, and it matters.

Here's what they actually look for, what makes them pass on candidates, and how to make sure they see what you want them to see.

What hiring managers search for

The patterns are consistent. They usually start with your full name. If that's too common, they'll add your city or your current employer. Some will search images. A few will look at LinkedIn specifically.

On page one they want to see:

  • Your LinkedIn profile, complete and current
  • Nothing alarming from news or court records
  • Evidence that you're real and consistent with what you put on your CV
  • Some sense of your professional interests or expertise

It takes them under a minute. If page one looks fine, they move on. If something catches their eye, they dig deeper. Usually into the negative direction.

What makes them reject you

CareerBuilder and Jobvite have run surveys of thousands of hiring managers on this. The top reasons for rejection based on an online search:

  1. Provocative or inappropriate photos or videos (usually from personal social media)
  2. Content about drinking or drug use
  3. Discriminatory comments or posts
  4. Bad-mouthing previous employers or colleagues
  5. Lying about qualifications that are visible online
  6. Poor communication skills visible in written posts
  7. Connections to criminal behaviour

Most of these are obvious. A few people lose interviews over things they didn't realise were findable. Old Facebook photos from 15 years ago. A forum post from when you were 22 and angry. A news article about something minor that happened to come up.

What makes them more likely to hire you

The same surveys found positive reasons too. Hiring managers are more likely to progress candidates when they find:

  • A complete LinkedIn profile with recent activity
  • Evidence of expertise, such as articles you've written or talks you've given
  • Professional associations or memberships
  • Creative portfolios if relevant to the role
  • Consistent personal branding across platforms

Notice what's not on that list. They don't need you to be famous. They don't need a massive following. They just need to see that you're a real professional with a consistent identity who hasn't done anything embarrassing in public.

The specific things to check before your next interview

Open an incognito browser window. Don't be logged into Google. Search your full name. Then search your full name plus your city. Note down what's on page one for each.

Now go through and ask:

Is my LinkedIn the first result? If not, it means your LinkedIn profile isn't fully optimised. Complete it. Add a professional photo. Write a proper headline and about section. Post something this week.

Is there anything I don't want them to see? Old social media posts, drunk photos tagged from 2014, a news article about a traffic offence. If it exists and it's findable, either remove it (if you can) or push it down by publishing more content that ranks higher.

Is there nothing at all? A total absence reads as suspicious in 2026. People expect to find you. If there's nothing, they wonder why. Build at least a LinkedIn, an About.me page, and maybe a personal website.

Am I getting confused with someone else? If your name is common, Google might show results for other people. Some of those other people might have done worse things than you. The solution is to build enough content about yourself that Google stops confusing you.

Are there any data broker listings? WhitePages, Spokeo, or similar sites showing your age and address look strange on a candidate search. Opt out of them or push them down.

The timeline matters

If you have an interview next week, you can't fix much before then. Claiming new profiles takes weeks to rank. Removing content takes time even when the publisher agrees.

The right time to clean up your online presence is before you need it. Six months ahead of a job search, not the night before.

If you're already in a search and you've just realised you have a problem, your options are:

  • Update your LinkedIn immediately (this will at least show recent activity)
  • Remove anything you control that's unflattering
  • Acknowledge anything unfixable during the interview before they bring it up

Being upfront about a past issue is almost always better than hoping they won't find it. They will.

The people who never worry about this

Candidates who win interviews before they start tend to have a few things in common. They update their LinkedIn regularly. They've claimed profiles on several platforms. They don't have social media full of embarrassing content. They have maybe one or two public examples of their work, like an article or a talk.

None of this is glamorous. It's just basic online presence maintenance. Most people don't do it until they need to, and by then they're behind.

Where to start

If you want to know what an employer is actually seeing when they Google you, run Cetra's free reputation audit. It scans Google Australia for your name, classifies every result, and gives you a score out of 100 based on how your search results would look to an employer.

60 seconds. No credit card. Worth knowing before the next one.

Run your free reputation audit

See your reputation score in 60 seconds. No credit card required.

Get your free audit