For Australian lawyers
Most clients Google their lawyer before signing the engagement letter. What appears in those 10 results either gets you the brief or quietly costs you it. Cetra audits what they see, identifies gaps, and builds authority content to push down what you don't want.
60 seconds · No credit card · 7-day free trial when you subscribe
A potential client comparing two boutique commercial firms is making a decision worth tens of thousands in fees. They will spend three minutes on Google before booking. If your search results read as inactive, mismatched with your firm bio, or worse, dominated by an old controversy, they pick the other firm and you don't know why.
Family law, criminal defence, employment, and personal injury all produce a steady supply of former clients with reasons to be unhappy. Some of them write reviews. Some post on forums. A small number create lasting Google problems for the lawyer years after the matter closed.
AustLII, court reporting, professional registers, and Australian directory sites surface partnership names, past matters, and sometimes home suburbs. None of this is removable. Most of it is fine. Some of it is a problem when stacked on page one alongside everything else.
When we audit lawyer reputations, three search patterns dominate. Cetra runs all three on your behalf, so you see the same results a serious prospect sees.
Search 1
Your full name
The most-searched. LinkedIn usually wins, your firm bio comes second, then it varies. This is where shared-name confusion and old social media tend to show up.
Search 2
Your name plus your city or firm
Cleans up the result set, but exposes what you don't control. If the second result is a Lawyers Weekly piece about a colleague with the same name, you have a problem.
Search 3
Your name plus your practice area
What the client typed when they decided “I need a defamation lawyer in Sydney.” This is the highest-intent search and the one most worth winning.
See more on what Google shows when someone searches your name.
Crunchbase, Mondaq author profile, Medium, an updated LinkedIn About section, an About.me page on your name. Each one fills a slot on page one that might otherwise be taken by an old article or a same-named stranger. Cetra checks 58 high-authority platforms in total.
A 250-word LinkedIn About section in your voice, drafts of practice-relevant Medium articles, and a profile bio for each platform. You review and publish. Cetra never posts on your behalf, which keeps you in control of anything that might brush against your professional obligations.
WhitePages and similar sites publish your home suburb, age, and sometimes phone number. The Pro plan submits opt-out requests on your behalf and tracks the responses. More on removing yourself from Australian data brokers.
Cetra works for any lawyer with a public profile, but the impact compounds in these areas.
Your own search results are a demonstration of competence. A defamation lawyer with three negative results on page one is a hard sell.
Bitter former clients leave reviews, post on forums, and sometimes create dedicated complaint sites. Cetra cannot remove these, but reverse SEO pushes them off page one within months.
Contentious cases stick to your name in news indexes for years. Authority content from you, on platforms Google trusts, almost always outranks an article from 2018 that is no longer being updated.
Client reviews matter. Strong owned profiles plus a structured response to legitimate negative reviews turns the result set into evidence that you handle disputes well.
Three things lawyers commonly ask about up front.
That is what a defamation claim is for. If your situation needs a defamation case, talk to a defamation lawyer, not a reputation tool. More on what can and cannot be removed.
Every piece of generated content is reviewed by you before it goes anywhere. This is deliberate, not a limitation. You should not have AI publishing in your name without review.
Anyone who promises position one for your name in two weeks is selling something that does not work. Realistic timelines are 4 to 12 weeks for most lawyers, longer if there are entrenched negatives.
Many of the lawyers we work with come to Cetra first for their own results, then start sending clients with reputation problems they cannot solve through legal channels. The partner programme handles referral tracking and pays commission on conversions.
Cetra is the self-serve tool. ORMA is the fully managed service from the same team. Lawyers with serious or high-stakes reputation issues usually engage ORMA for done-for-you work. Different products, different price points.
Run a free reputation audit. Score in 60 seconds. No credit card required.
Run my free audit7-day free trial when you subscribe. Cancel anytime.